Your GTM Might Be Ready for Agentic SaaS. Is Your Pricing?
A risk-auditing platform's pricing model was mathematically perfect — a percentage of risk prevented. The psychology wasn't, and that gap can hand your biggest accounts to a simpler competitor.
A risk-auditing platform pitches pricing that looks perfect on a spreadsheet: charge a percentage of the risk value it identifies and prevents. Bigger enterprise, bigger exposure, bigger fee — textbook value-based design. It can still lose your largest accounts, not because the math is wrong but because the psychology is: as customers get better and bigger, their fee grows precisely as they succeed, which starts to feel like a tax on success — and a competitor with simpler, flatter pricing suddenly looks like the safer bet. This piece walks through a five-tier pricing progression from per-input to per-outcome, the COMPASS framework for locating the right metric on your product's scope-and-attribution map, and four concrete fixes — capping the fee, tiering the percentage down, blending the model, making the calculation joint — for getting outcome-based pricing right without losing the accounts it's supposed to reward.
Read the full article on LinkedIn → here